Improving game population management by implementing adaptive principles
Abstract
In Belarus, game species population management principles are based on determining the optimal species abundance in a specific area, established by game management, based on habitat quality assessments and species abundance, obtained through various surveys. The quality and capacity of wild animal habitats are highly dynamic. Currently, a scientifically sound and accurate method for assessing them does not exist. To improve game species management, it is proposed to introduce adaptive management principles. Indicators that can be used to assess population status and their negative impact on human activities are described. A system for collecting and analyzing indicators is substantiated for government agencies to support their decision-making in nature management related to hunting.
About the Author
P. A. Heshtaut
Scientific and Practical Center of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus on Bioresources
Belarus
Belarus
Minsk
References
1. Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores / N. Morellet, J. M. Gaillard, A. J. M. Hewison [et al.] // Journal of Applied Ecology. – 2007. – Vol. 44. – P. 634–643.
2. Empirical evidence of density dependence in populations of large herbivores / C. Bonefant, J. M. Gaillard, T. Coulson [et al.] // Advances in Ecological Research. – 2009. – Vol. 41. – P. 317–318.
3. Гештовт, П. А. О необходимости смены модели биологического управления ресурсами копытных в Беларуси / П. А. Гештовт, А. В. Гуринович // Копытные в изменяющемся мире – последствия для популяционной динамики, миграции и управления : тез. докл. Междунар. конф., 19–21 сент. 2016, Красный бор, Беларусь. – Витебск, 2016. – С. 19.
4. Apollonio, M. Challenges and science-based implications for modern management and conservation of European ungulate populations / M. Apollonio, V. V. Belkin, J. Borkowski // Mammal Research. – 2017. – Vol. 62, № 3. – P. 209–217.
5. Anderson, D. R. The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies / D. R. Anderson // Wildlife Society Bulletin. – 2001. – Vol. 29, № 4. – P. 1294–1297.
6. Anderson, D. R. Response to Engeman: index values rarely constitute reliable information / D. R. Anderson // Wildlife Society Bulletin. – 2003. – Vol. 31, № 1. – P. 288–291.
7. Witmer, G. W. Wildlife population monitoring: some practical considerations / G. W. Witmer // Wildlife Research. – 2005. – Vol. 32. – Р. 259–263.
8. Van Horne, B. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality / B. van Horne // Journal of Wildlife Management. – 1983. – Vol. 47, № 4. – Р. 893–901.
9. Hall, L. S. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology / L. S. Hall, P. R. Krausman, M. L. Morrison // Wildlife Society Bulletin. – 1997. – Vol. 25. – Р. 173–182.
10. Johnson, M. D. Measuring habitat quality: a review / M. D. Johnson // The Condor: Ornithological Applications. – 2007. – Vol. 109, iss. 3. – P. 489–504.
11. Hobbs, N. T. Habitat valuation: do use/availability data reflect carrying capacity? / N. T. Hobbs, T. A. Hanley // Journal of Wildlife Management. – 1990. – Vol. 54, № 4. – Apollonio, M. – P. 515–522.
12. ARM! For the future: adaptive resource management in the wildlife profession / R. Lancia, C. Braun, M. Collopy [et al.] // Wildlife Society Bulletin. – 1996. – Vol. 24, № 3. – P. 436–442.
13. Clutton-Brock, T. H. The costs of reproduction to red deer hinds / T. H. Clutton-Brock, F. E. Guinness, S. D. Albon // Journal of Animal Ecology. – 1983. – Vol. 52. – P. 367–383.
14. Proaktor, G. The Demographic Consequences of the Cost of Reproduction in Ungulates / G. Proaktor, T. Coulson, E. J. Milner-Gulland // Ecology. – 2008. – Vol. 89, № 9. – P. 2604–2611.
15. McLoughlin, P. D. Cross-generational effects of habitat and density оn life history in red deer / P. D. McLoughlin, T. Coulson, T. H. Clutton-Brock // Ecology. – 2008. – Vol. 89, № 12. – P. 3317–3326.
16. McCullough, D. R. Lessons from the George Reserve / D. R. McCullough // White-tailed deer: ecology and management. – Pensilvania : Stackpole Books, 1984. – P. 211–241.
17. Гештовт, П. ДТП с участием диких животных: закономерности и сравнительный анализ / П. Гештовт, С. Гузней // Наука и инновации. – 2023. – № 8. – С. 70–75.
18. Langbein, J. Traffic collisions involving deer and other ungulates in Europe and available measures for mitigation / J. Langbein, R. Putman, B. Pokorny // Ungulate Management in Europe: Problems and Practices / R. Putman, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen (Eds.). – Cambridge, 2011. – Р. 215–259.
19. Аpollonio, M. European Ungulates and Their Management in the 21st Century / M. Аpollonio, A. Reidar, R. Putman. – Cambridge, 2010. – 604 p.
20. Pokorny, B. Roe deer-vehicle collisions in Slovenia: situation, mitigation strategy and countermeasures / B. Pokorny // Veterinarski Arhiv. – 2006. – № 76. – Р. 177–187.
21. Гештовт П. А. Трофей – важный показатель состояния популяций (ч. 1) / П. А Гештовт // Русский охотничий журнал. – 2018. – № 3. – С. 12–16.
22. Гештовт П. А. Трофей – важный показатель состояния популяций (ч. 2) / П. А Гештовт // Русский охотничий журнал. – 2018. – № 4. – С. 14–18.
23. Правила ведения охотничьего хозяйства : утв. Указом Президента Респ. Беларусь от 21 марта 2018 г. № 112 : в ред. Указа Президента Респ. Беларусь 16.09.2020 № 345. – URL: https://ilex-private.ilex.by/view-document/BELAW/223044/%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0%20%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%8B?searchKey=7kp8&docSwitcherKey=4smf&searchPosition=1#M101757 (дата обращения: 04.03.2026).
24. Инструкция о порядке планирования изъятия охотничьих животных нормируемых видов : утв. постановлением М-ва лесн. хоз-ва Респ. Беларусь от 12 марта 2025 г. № 7. – URL: https://ilex-private.ilex.by/view-document/BELAW/227820/%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F%20%D0%BF%D0%BE%20%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8E%20%D0%B8%D0%B7%D1%8A%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%8F?searchKey=lwke&docSwitcherKey=9z8y&searchPosition=2#M100023 (дата обращения: 04.03.2026).
25. Гештовт, П. А. Адаптивное управление – дорога в будущее охотничьего хозяйства (ч. 1) / П. А. Гештовт // Русский охотничий журнал. – 2018. – № 9. – С. 12–18.
26. Гештовт, П. А. Адаптивное управление – дорога в будущее охотничьего хозяйства (ч. 2) / П. А. Гештовт // Русский охотничий журнал. – 2018. – № 10. – С. 8–16.
Review
For citations:
Heshtaut P.A. Improving game population management by implementing adaptive principles. Natural resources. 2026;(1):5-15. (In Russ.)
Views:
78
JATS XML
Email this article 